header-logo header-logo

No smoking for inmates

09 March 2015
Issue: 7644 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Prisoners do not have a human right to smoke and the public ban on smoking in enclosed public spaces applies to state prisons, the High Court has held.

Although the case concerns prisons, the main issue of law applies to all government buildings.  

In Black v Secretary of State for Justice [2015] EWHC 528 (Admin), Mr Justice Singh ruled in favour of Paul Black, an inmate of HMP Wymott, a non-smoker with health problems who was concerned about the effect of second-hand smoke.

The case centred on whether Part 1 of the Health Act 2006, which bans smoking in enclosed public spaces and workplaces, applied to state prisons under the authority of the Crown. 

The Secretary of State argued that the Health Act 2006, so far as material, does not apply to any government buildings or spaces, on the ground that the relevant part of the Act does not bind the Crown.

Prison policy is that inmates are permitted to smoke in their own cells but not in common areas. Similarly, staff are not permitted to smoke in common areas.

Mr Singh held that the 2006 Act applies to all public places and workplaces which fall within its scope, including those for which the Crown is responsible, therefore both state and private sector prisons are bound by it.

However, he rejected the claimant’s arguments that his human rights had been breached and that there had been a breach of the Prison Rules 1999.
Mr Singh stayed his order pending any appeal.

A Ministry of Justice (MoJ) spokesperson said: “As this is an ongoing legal matter it would not be appropriate to comment further.”

 

Issue: 7644 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll