header-logo header-logo

No smoking for inmates

09 March 2015
Issue: 7644 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Prisoners do not have a human right to smoke and the public ban on smoking in enclosed public spaces applies to state prisons, the High Court has held.

Although the case concerns prisons, the main issue of law applies to all government buildings.  

In Black v Secretary of State for Justice [2015] EWHC 528 (Admin), Mr Justice Singh ruled in favour of Paul Black, an inmate of HMP Wymott, a non-smoker with health problems who was concerned about the effect of second-hand smoke.

The case centred on whether Part 1 of the Health Act 2006, which bans smoking in enclosed public spaces and workplaces, applied to state prisons under the authority of the Crown. 

The Secretary of State argued that the Health Act 2006, so far as material, does not apply to any government buildings or spaces, on the ground that the relevant part of the Act does not bind the Crown.

Prison policy is that inmates are permitted to smoke in their own cells but not in common areas. Similarly, staff are not permitted to smoke in common areas.

Mr Singh held that the 2006 Act applies to all public places and workplaces which fall within its scope, including those for which the Crown is responsible, therefore both state and private sector prisons are bound by it.

However, he rejected the claimant’s arguments that his human rights had been breached and that there had been a breach of the Prison Rules 1999.
Mr Singh stayed his order pending any appeal.

A Ministry of Justice (MoJ) spokesperson said: “As this is an ongoing legal matter it would not be appropriate to comment further.”

 

Issue: 7644 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
back-to-top-scroll