header-logo header-logo

09 March 2015
Issue: 7644 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

No smoking for inmates

Prisoners do not have a human right to smoke and the public ban on smoking in enclosed public spaces applies to state prisons, the High Court has held.

Although the case concerns prisons, the main issue of law applies to all government buildings.  

In Black v Secretary of State for Justice [2015] EWHC 528 (Admin), Mr Justice Singh ruled in favour of Paul Black, an inmate of HMP Wymott, a non-smoker with health problems who was concerned about the effect of second-hand smoke.

The case centred on whether Part 1 of the Health Act 2006, which bans smoking in enclosed public spaces and workplaces, applied to state prisons under the authority of the Crown. 

The Secretary of State argued that the Health Act 2006, so far as material, does not apply to any government buildings or spaces, on the ground that the relevant part of the Act does not bind the Crown.

Prison policy is that inmates are permitted to smoke in their own cells but not in common areas. Similarly, staff are not permitted to smoke in common areas.

Mr Singh held that the 2006 Act applies to all public places and workplaces which fall within its scope, including those for which the Crown is responsible, therefore both state and private sector prisons are bound by it.

However, he rejected the claimant’s arguments that his human rights had been breached and that there had been a breach of the Prison Rules 1999.
Mr Singh stayed his order pending any appeal.

A Ministry of Justice (MoJ) spokesperson said: “As this is an ongoing legal matter it would not be appropriate to comment further.”

 

Issue: 7644 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll