header-logo header-logo

03 August 2017
Issue: 7757 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

No UK crime of aggression

An attempt to bring a private war crimes prosecution against Prime Minister Tony Blair for his role in the 2003 Iraq war has foundered in the High Court.

Former Iraqi general, Abdulwaheed al-Rabbat attempted to pursue Blair, former foreign secretary Jack Straw and former attorney general Lord Goldsmith for the crime of aggression. However, Lord Thomas, the Lord Chief Justice, and Mr Justice Ouseley held that the crime of aggression is unknown in English law, in Al-Rabbat v Blair [2017] EWHC 1969 (Admin).

It held it was bound by the unanimous House of Lords‘ decision in R v Jones (Margaret) [2007] 1 AC 136, in the context of the invasion of Iraq, that although there was a crime of aggression under customary international law, there was no such crime as the crime of aggression under the law of England and Wales.

Giving the lead judgment, Lord Thomas said it was ‘for Parliament and Parliament alone’ to make the crime part of domestic law.

Issue: 7757 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll