header-logo header-logo

10 February 2011
Issue: 7452 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

No VAT on disbursements

VAT will not be applied to medical report costs in personal injury cases following a successful appeal against Her Majesty’s Revenue and Customs (HMRC).

Previously, fees paid to medical experts for reports and records were regarded as a disbursement and therefore free from VAT.

In 2008, HMRC changed its approach and raised an assessment on Nottingham law firm Barratt Goff & Tomlinson requiring VAT to be paid in respect of such fees. The firm successfully challenged HMRCs assessment.

Law Society president Linda Lee said the decision is a reminder that HMRC guidance is not necessarily an accurate reflection of the law.

“While HMRC have well-established guidelines on what may be treated as a disbursement for VAT purposes, its interpretation of those guidelines to require solicitors to account for VAT on items obtained as agent for their client...had caused confusion in the solicitors’ profession. 

“The approach taken by HMRC would have increased the costs of pursuing personal injury and clinical negligence cases. These increased costs would have been met by insurance companies, the NHS and the Legal Services Commission.”

Issue: 7452 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime expert joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll