header-logo header-logo

14 August 2008 / Alex Dumbrell
Issue: 7334 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Non-party costs orders

Alex Dumbrell considers the implications of Oriakhel v Vickers

Non-party costs orders

The court has a discretion to make a costs order against a non-party, and such orders are often sought in circumstances when the losing party is unable to meet its costs liability. Such orders are exceptional, however this means no more than outside the ordinary run of cases. A non-party will normally need to have some connection with the claim to be made the subject of an order for costs.

The recent Court of Appeal case of Oriakhel v Vickers is a reminder to practitioners of the importance of giving a non-party early notice of any plans to apply for a costs order against him. Notice should be given in a way that is non-threatening and non-aggressive. Where allegations are made against the non-party at trial, consider joining the non-party as a party to the original proceedings to give him the opportunity to defend himself.

Facts of Oriakhel v Vickers

Mr Oriakhel brought a road accident claim against Mr Vickers. Mr Khan

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll