header-logo header-logo

10 February 2023 / Tim Seal
Issue: 8012 / Categories: Features , Profession , Construction , ADR
printer mail-detail

Non-payment challenges in the construction industry

110012
Tim Seal questions the effectiveness of the statutory payment regime
  • The importance of having an effective payment regime for construction works.
  • Summary and failures of the statutory payment regime.
  • How smash and grab cases are more likely to arise.

Contractors in the UK construction industry have for a long time worked on small profit margins, which has been a factor in the high turnover of contractors and regular disruption to construction projects. Today, high inflation, the increasing cost of energy and the shortage of some construction materials, when added to the history of fine margins, makes for financial precariousness across the industry. So, in that climate, the prompt payment (or non-payment) for construction works, is often a matter of trading life or death. Moreover, with lengthy supply chains in construction, it doesn’t take long for payment problems to have a widespread impact.

In this article we look at how legislation and industry best practice try to manage payment for construction works and how, despite that,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll