header-logo header-logo

19 November 2009 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7394 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Northern justice

Michael Zander reports on Scottish proposals for civil justice reform

Although many of the recommendations of the Report of the Scottish Civil Courts Review (the Gill report), published in September, are of interest purely in Scotland, some are of wider interest, especially in the context of “the Woolf Reforms 10-Years-On” debates.

The review was carried out over two years by four judges led by Lord Gill, the lord justice clerk.

The most important recommendations concern the organisation of the courts structure. The root of the civil justice problem, Lord Gill says in his introduction, is that Scotland, uniquely among the major jurisdictions of the British Isles, has no proper hierarchy of civil courts. At first instance, the jurisdiction of the sheriff court and the court of session mostly overlap, with only two levels of judge. As a result, “much of the work of these courts is done by judges and sheriffs who are over-qualified for it”.

The report recommends a major transfer of business from the court of session to the sheriff court. (The

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll