header-logo header-logo

11 October 2007
Issue: 7292 / Categories: Legal News , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-detail

Nose-stud employee reinstated

News

A Hindu woman, sacked from Heathrow Airport for wearing a nose-stud, has been reinstated.

Amrit Lalji had worked as a cleaner and customer relations worker in a VIP lounge for over a year when she was fired for wearing a nose-stud that her employer, Eurest, a catering company, said could be hazardous.
Lalji claimed the jewellery was religious, comparable to a wedding band, but when she refused to remove it she was suspended and later sacked.
Brian Palmer, employment partner at Charles Russell LLP, says Lalji’s reinstatement, which was done before the case went to an employment tribunal in a claim under the Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003 (SI 2003/1660), was a sensible decision.

He says: “The key point in Lalji’s case is that, although employed by a caterer, her job did not have any involvement with catering. Had the matter gone to tribunal then Eurest would have had to seek to justify the requirement for the removal of jewellery set against the job which Lalji carried out. That would have been difficult to achieve.”

Palmer adds: “While employers may consider that a blanket policy applied equally to all employees may offer them the best protection against potential discrimination claims, thought has to be given to policies and the rationale behind them for their enforcement to be successful and non-discriminatory.”

Issue: 7292 / Categories: Legal News , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll