header-logo header-logo

11 October 2007
Issue: 7292 / Categories: Legal News , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-detail

Nose-stud employee reinstated

News

A Hindu woman, sacked from Heathrow Airport for wearing a nose-stud, has been reinstated.

Amrit Lalji had worked as a cleaner and customer relations worker in a VIP lounge for over a year when she was fired for wearing a nose-stud that her employer, Eurest, a catering company, said could be hazardous.
Lalji claimed the jewellery was religious, comparable to a wedding band, but when she refused to remove it she was suspended and later sacked.
Brian Palmer, employment partner at Charles Russell LLP, says Lalji’s reinstatement, which was done before the case went to an employment tribunal in a claim under the Employment Equality (Religion or Belief) Regulations 2003 (SI 2003/1660), was a sensible decision.

He says: “The key point in Lalji’s case is that, although employed by a caterer, her job did not have any involvement with catering. Had the matter gone to tribunal then Eurest would have had to seek to justify the requirement for the removal of jewellery set against the job which Lalji carried out. That would have been difficult to achieve.”

Palmer adds: “While employers may consider that a blanket policy applied equally to all employees may offer them the best protection against potential discrimination claims, thought has to be given to policies and the rationale behind them for their enforcement to be successful and non-discriminatory.”

Issue: 7292 / Categories: Legal News , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll