header-logo header-logo

18 June 2009
Issue: 7374 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Not the right IDea

Civil liberties

Lord Steyn, a former lord of appeal in ordinary, has called for the identity card scheme to be scrapped.
Speaking this week, Lord Steyn highlighted the lack of evidence that a National Identity Register will serve to combat serious crime, and expressed concerns about the privacy implications for members of the public given the series of security leaks which have occurred.
“In my view a national identity card system is not necessary in our country. No further money should be spent on it. The idea should be abandoned,” he said.

Lord Steyn questioned whether the government was capable of running a national identity card system, citing numerous data losses since May 2007, including the loss of two discs of child benefit data lost by HM Revenue & Customs which affected 25 million individuals. Such instances, he said, “legitimately prompt the question whether the British public should have confidence in the scheme the government proposes to introduce”.

Lord Steyn went on to say that successive UK governments had constructed one of the most comprehensive and technologically advanced surveillance systems in the world. “The Home Office proudly asserts that comprehensive surveillance has become routine,” he said. “If that is true, the resemblance to the world of Kafka is no longer so very distant.” Despite recent contributions in the House of Lords to the debate on civil liberties, Lord Steyn said he doubted there was much hope of the executive taking action to counter the excesses of the surveillance society. “On the contrary,” he said, “the state relentlessly acts to extend surveillance practices and to diminish correspondingly our civil liberties”.
 

Issue: 7374 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll