header-logo header-logo

18 June 2009
Issue: 7374 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Not the right IDea

Civil liberties

Lord Steyn, a former lord of appeal in ordinary, has called for the identity card scheme to be scrapped.
Speaking this week, Lord Steyn highlighted the lack of evidence that a National Identity Register will serve to combat serious crime, and expressed concerns about the privacy implications for members of the public given the series of security leaks which have occurred.
“In my view a national identity card system is not necessary in our country. No further money should be spent on it. The idea should be abandoned,” he said.

Lord Steyn questioned whether the government was capable of running a national identity card system, citing numerous data losses since May 2007, including the loss of two discs of child benefit data lost by HM Revenue & Customs which affected 25 million individuals. Such instances, he said, “legitimately prompt the question whether the British public should have confidence in the scheme the government proposes to introduce”.

Lord Steyn went on to say that successive UK governments had constructed one of the most comprehensive and technologically advanced surveillance systems in the world. “The Home Office proudly asserts that comprehensive surveillance has become routine,” he said. “If that is true, the resemblance to the world of Kafka is no longer so very distant.” Despite recent contributions in the House of Lords to the debate on civil liberties, Lord Steyn said he doubted there was much hope of the executive taking action to counter the excesses of the surveillance society. “On the contrary,” he said, “the state relentlessly acts to extend surveillance practices and to diminish correspondingly our civil liberties”.
 

Issue: 7374 / Categories: Legal News , Human rights
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
back-to-top-scroll