header-logo header-logo

Not so hip?

14 June 2007 / Peter Ambrose
Issue: 7277 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Rumours of the death of HIPs have been greatly exaggerated, explains Peter Ambrose

When the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, Ruth Kelly, rose to speak in the House of Commons at 3.30pm on 22 May, the home information pack (HIP) industry held its collective breath. With HIPs due to start in a matter of days, preparation and implementation among estate agents, HIP providers and solicitors had been building to a noisy crescendo.

Ten minutes later, this had been replaced by a palpable vacuum.
The delay to HIPs resulted in hastily rewritten editorials, cancellation of HIP-based advertising and the dismissal of support staff hired just days before.
Although analysts immediately predicted this was the beginning of the end for HIPs, a week later, with the dust settled, the government has reaffirmed its commitment at cabinet level. Although the green fog of the energy performance certificate (EPC) has clouded the project, HIPs continue to be a government manifesto pledge to improve the house buying and selling process. With trade advertising due to restart in June,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Pillsbury—Peter O’Hare

Partner hire bolstersprivate capital and global aviation finance offering

Morae—Carla Mendy

Morae—Carla Mendy

Digital and business solutions firm appoints chief operating officer

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Twenty Essex—Clementine Makower & Stephen Du

Set welcomes two experienced juniors as new tenants

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll