header-logo header-logo

Not so hip?

14 June 2007 / Peter Ambrose
Issue: 7277 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Rumours of the death of HIPs have been greatly exaggerated, explains Peter Ambrose

When the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, Ruth Kelly, rose to speak in the House of Commons at 3.30pm on 22 May, the home information pack (HIP) industry held its collective breath. With HIPs due to start in a matter of days, preparation and implementation among estate agents, HIP providers and solicitors had been building to a noisy crescendo.

Ten minutes later, this had been replaced by a palpable vacuum.
The delay to HIPs resulted in hastily rewritten editorials, cancellation of HIP-based advertising and the dismissal of support staff hired just days before.
Although analysts immediately predicted this was the beginning of the end for HIPs, a week later, with the dust settled, the government has reaffirmed its commitment at cabinet level. Although the green fog of the energy performance certificate (EPC) has clouded the project, HIPs continue to be a government manifesto pledge to improve the house buying and selling process. With trade advertising due to restart in June,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll