header-logo header-logo

A not so simple solution

12 January 2018 / Derek Adamson
Issue: 7776 / Categories: Features , Profession , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail
nlj_7776_adamson

Derek Adamson discusses the current issues with the Third Parties (Rights against Insurers) Act 2010, & suggests some improvements

On 1 August 2016, the Third Parties (Rights against Insurers) Act 2010 (the 2010 Act) came into force. This well-intentioned legislation 80 years after its predecessor of the same name (the 1930 Act) was supported by insurers and claimants as it streamlined the process for recovery of damages in long-tail disease litigation. The new statute permits an action against the insurer of an insolvent tortfeasor directly rather than restoring the insured company and obtaining judgment before being able to enforce against the insurer. The legal costs of restoration and the resultant delay would be avoided. A win-win for all… or so it seemed.

During 2017, as the impact of the new law bedded in, two issues relating to mesothelioma and asbestos-related lung cancer claims emerged. A key transitional provision is that where the insolvency event and the incurring of liability both take place before 1 August 2016, the 1930 Act continues to apply.

Issue

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll