header-logo header-logo

12 January 2018 / Derek Adamson
Issue: 7776 / Categories: Features , Profession , Insurance / reinsurance
printer mail-detail

A not so simple solution

nlj_7776_adamson

Derek Adamson discusses the current issues with the Third Parties (Rights against Insurers) Act 2010, & suggests some improvements

On 1 August 2016, the Third Parties (Rights against Insurers) Act 2010 (the 2010 Act) came into force. This well-intentioned legislation 80 years after its predecessor of the same name (the 1930 Act) was supported by insurers and claimants as it streamlined the process for recovery of damages in long-tail disease litigation. The new statute permits an action against the insurer of an insolvent tortfeasor directly rather than restoring the insured company and obtaining judgment before being able to enforce against the insurer. The legal costs of restoration and the resultant delay would be avoided. A win-win for all… or so it seemed.

During 2017, as the impact of the new law bedded in, two issues relating to mesothelioma and asbestos-related lung cancer claims emerged. A key transitional provision is that where the insolvency event and the incurring of liability both take place before 1 August 2016, the 1930 Act continues to apply.

Issue

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise expands London secondaries team with addition of Mary Lavelle

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law welcomes ex-Irwin Mitchell team to launch Hestia Private Client

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Heavyweight patent litigator will bolster Carpmaels Ransford’s rapidly growing Litigation team as firm marks its 250th anniversary

NEWS
Lawyers have welcomed plans to create specialist rape and serious sex offences courtrooms at every Crown Court
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
back-to-top-scroll