header-logo header-logo

26 April 2018
Issue: 7790 / Categories: Legal News , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

Nothing simple about child support

The child support scheme is ‘Kafkaesque’ and in desperate need of simplification, a prominent family lawyer has warned.

Writing in NLJ this week, family law solicitor David Burrows says most parents are unrepresented, legal aid is rare and few lawyers deal with it, while ‘the majority of civil servants who operate the various branches of child support struggle with the meaning of swathes of the complex secondary legislation’.

Little, however, has been done to simplify the scheme. Another problem is that an individual parent has no legal right to sue for payment of arrears—only the Child Support Agency itself has the right to enforce arrears.

‘By any standards—especially of the single parents and children it is designed to help—the scheme’s success has been only very partial,’ says Burrows.

‘There are billions of pounds of child support maintenance in accumulated arrears, and no prospect of that being recovered.’

Issue: 7790 / Categories: Legal News , Child law , Family
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise expands London secondaries team with addition of Mary Lavelle

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law welcomes ex-Irwin Mitchell team to launch Hestia Private Client

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Heavyweight patent litigator will bolster Carpmaels Ransford’s rapidly growing Litigation team as firm marks its 250th anniversary

NEWS
Lawyers have welcomed plans to create specialist rape and serious sex offences courtrooms at every Crown Court
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
back-to-top-scroll