header-logo header-logo

12 October 2012
Issue: 7533 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Nuisance

Stannard (t/a Wyvern Tyres) v Gore [2012] EWCA Civ 1248, [2012] All ER (D) 44 (Oct)

The case law suggested that, in an appropriate case, damage caused by fire emanating from an adjoining property could fall within the Rylands v Fletcher rule. The appropriate case, however, was likely to be very rare, because (i) it was the “thing” that had been brought onto the land which had to escape, not the fire which was started or increased by the “thing”; (ii) while the fire might be a dangerous thing, the occasions when fire as such was deliberately brought onto the land might be limited to cases where the fire had been deliberately or negligently started by the occupier or one for whom he was responsible; and (iii) in any event, starting a fire on one’s land might be an ordinary use of the land.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise expands London secondaries team with addition of Mary Lavelle

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law welcomes ex-Irwin Mitchell team to launch Hestia Private Client

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Carpmaels & Ransford—Christopher Stothers

Heavyweight patent litigator will bolster Carpmaels Ransford’s rapidly growing Litigation team as firm marks its 250th anniversary

NEWS
Lawyers have welcomed plans to create specialist rape and serious sex offences courtrooms at every Crown Court
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
back-to-top-scroll