header-logo header-logo

08 June 2016
Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-detail

Nuno Frota & Martin Sandgren—Ince & Co

Firm recruits & promotes two transactional energy partners

Ince & Co has announced the recruitment and promotion of two partners in its transactional energy practice in London.

Nuno Frota joins Ince & Co from Trafigura, one of the world's largest private oil and metals traders, where he was senior legal counsel for Africa. Nuno is triple-qualified in England and Wales, Angola and Portugal. He has been involved in high value oil and gas projects in Africa for clients in the upstream, midstream and downstream markets and has further mining and minerals expertise. He also advises on African foreign direct investment and international joint ventures related to natural resources.

Martin Sandgren has been promoted to the Ince & Co partnership. He joined the firm as of counsel in 2014 from Siemens Wind Power where he was co-head of legal for five years. He is triple qualified in England and Wales, the US and Sweden. Martin focuses on structuring, negotiating and managing legal risks on large and complex on- and off-shore renewable energy projects. He has experience of advising on transactions throughout Europe, the Middle East, Africa, the United States and East Asia. He has particular experience advising on EPC/consortiums, offshore construction, supply and service agreements, charterparties and other vessel related contracts, project finance and project agreements. He also advises on joint ventures, M&A, disputes, insurance and risk management matters.

Jan Heuvels, Ince & Co’s International senior partner, comments: “The partner appointments of Nuno and Martin provide further evidence of the progress that we are making in building our transactional offering in our core sectors and geographies to complement our leading contentious capability. Since June 2015, we have announced a total of 19 new partners, 13 of whom specialise in advising clients on transactions.”

Jeremy Farr, Ince & Co’s global head of energy, adds: “I’d like to welcome Nuno to the team and congratulate Martin on his promotion. Their considerable expertise and in-house experience make them a natural choice for partnership. Their appointments add further strength to our transactional offering to clients, particularly in the African oil and gas and the international renewables sectors.”

Nominations for the Halsbury Legal Awards 2016, in association with NLJ, are now open. Visit the site to view all the categories and enter online. #Halsbury2016

Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers to be joined by leading family law set, 4 Brick Court, this summer

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Real estate and construction energy offering boosted by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Firm bolsters real estate team with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll