header-logo header-logo

O brave new world

28 March 2013 / Jo Renshaw
Issue: 7554 / Categories: Opinion , Legal services , Profession , Immigration & asylum , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Jo Renshaw outlines the effect LASPO 2012 will have on those doing publicly funded work

On 1 April 2013 the changes, which all those undertaking publicly funded work hoped would never see the light of day, will be implemented. This was described at a recent Legal Services Commission training event as the “Go Live” date. Given that most of us will be savouring a much-needed Bank Holiday lie-in on that day, the “Go Live” date (also coinciding with April Fools’ Day) is not without a certain irony and the reality is that the radical reshaping of access to justice will hit most of us when we crawl into work the following morning.

It is likely there will be a continuing exodus of those currently undertaking publicly funded work. The way the recent tenders were structured has resulted in many firms being allocated even fewer cases (matter starts) than their worst-case scenario envisaged and this, combined with the very low rates of pay and the severe restrictions on scope, is in danger

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll