header-logo header-logo

28 March 2013 / Jo Renshaw
Issue: 7554 / Categories: Opinion , Legal services , Profession , Immigration & asylum , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

O brave new world

Jo Renshaw outlines the effect LASPO 2012 will have on those doing publicly funded work

On 1 April 2013 the changes, which all those undertaking publicly funded work hoped would never see the light of day, will be implemented. This was described at a recent Legal Services Commission training event as the “Go Live” date. Given that most of us will be savouring a much-needed Bank Holiday lie-in on that day, the “Go Live” date (also coinciding with April Fools’ Day) is not without a certain irony and the reality is that the radical reshaping of access to justice will hit most of us when we crawl into work the following morning.

It is likely there will be a continuing exodus of those currently undertaking publicly funded work. The way the recent tenders were structured has resulted in many firms being allocated even fewer cases (matter starts) than their worst-case scenario envisaged and this, combined with the very low rates of pay and the severe restrictions on scope, is in danger

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll