header-logo header-logo

13 June 2012
Categories: Legislation
printer mail-detail

Occupational and Personal Pension Schemes (Automatic Enrolment) (Amendment) (No 2) Regulations 2012 (SI 2012/1477)

The Pensions Act 2008 introduced a duty on all employers to automatically enrol “jobholders” into a workplace pension scheme...

Commencement date

2 July 2012
 

Legislation Affected

SI 2010/772 amended

Summary

Background

The Pensions Act 2008 introduced a duty on all employers to automatically enrol “jobholders” into a workplace pension scheme. The Act defines a jobholder as an individual aged at least 16 and under 75, earning more than the lower limit of the qualifying earnings band and “who is working or ordinarily works in Great Britain under the worker’s contract”.

Under the Occupational Pension Schemes (Cross-border Activities) Regulations 2005, SI 2005/3381, a “qualifying person” is an employed person whose place of work is located in an EU member state other than the UK whose relationship with their employer is subject to the social and labour law of that other member state.

What’s Changing?

These Regulations exempt employers from automatically enrolling employees who are both “jobholders” and “qualifying persons”.

Why?

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll