header-logo header-logo

Occupational and Personal Pension Schemes (Automatic Enrolment) (Amendment) (No 2) Regulations 2012 (SI 2012/1477)

13 June 2012
Categories: Legislation
printer mail-detail

The Pensions Act 2008 introduced a duty on all employers to automatically enrol “jobholders” into a workplace pension scheme...

Commencement date

2 July 2012
 

Legislation Affected

SI 2010/772 amended

Summary

Background

The Pensions Act 2008 introduced a duty on all employers to automatically enrol “jobholders” into a workplace pension scheme. The Act defines a jobholder as an individual aged at least 16 and under 75, earning more than the lower limit of the qualifying earnings band and “who is working or ordinarily works in Great Britain under the worker’s contract”.

Under the Occupational Pension Schemes (Cross-border Activities) Regulations 2005, SI 2005/3381, a “qualifying person” is an employed person whose place of work is located in an EU member state other than the UK whose relationship with their employer is subject to the social and labour law of that other member state.

What’s Changing?

These Regulations exempt employers from automatically enrolling employees who are both “jobholders” and “qualifying persons”.

Why?

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll