header-logo header-logo

Odds on for success?

05 November 2021 / Philip Young
Issue: 7955 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Litigation funding , Profession
printer mail-detail
63036
All bets are off: Philip Young discusses the difficulties of boiling a complex case down to a mathematical percentage
  • Practitioners are often asked by insurers, funders and clients to provide a percentage rating how likely a case is to succeed or fail. Determining this percentage is very difficult, and often results in an arbitrary or misleading figure.
  • Language is just as important as numbers, if not more so, in conveying the key information which is likely to affect the outcome of a case.

Nowadays, in modern commercial litigation, practitioners are frequently asked to predict the outcome of a case, issue or application in the form of a mathematical percentage. General counsel often ask for percentages for their own internal purposes, and the growth of the after the event (ATE) and litigation funding markets has also required lawyers to offer percentages, as many insurers and funders insist on a minimum percentage before agreeing terms. For any competent practitioner, offering a mathematical percentage is often an aspect of preparing any opinion that creates anguish, not least because

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll