header-logo header-logo

Odds on for success?

05 November 2021 / Philip Young
Issue: 7955 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Litigation funding , Profession
printer mail-detail
63036
All bets are off: Philip Young discusses the difficulties of boiling a complex case down to a mathematical percentage
  • Practitioners are often asked by insurers, funders and clients to provide a percentage rating how likely a case is to succeed or fail. Determining this percentage is very difficult, and often results in an arbitrary or misleading figure.
  • Language is just as important as numbers, if not more so, in conveying the key information which is likely to affect the outcome of a case.

Nowadays, in modern commercial litigation, practitioners are frequently asked to predict the outcome of a case, issue or application in the form of a mathematical percentage. General counsel often ask for percentages for their own internal purposes, and the growth of the after the event (ATE) and litigation funding markets has also required lawyers to offer percentages, as many insurers and funders insist on a minimum percentage before agreeing terms. For any competent practitioner, offering a mathematical percentage is often an aspect of preparing any opinion that creates anguish, not least because

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll