header-logo header-logo

Of magic circles & ‘financial remedies courts’

23 September 2022 / David Burrows
Issue: 7995 / Categories: Features , Family , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
94637
David Burrows reflects on the state of family law & considers the chances of alignment of the Family Procedure Rules 2010 with the Civil Procedure Rules 1998
  • Questions our understanding of the ‘magic circle’ of family lawyers.
  • Discusses the single family court and the use of the term ‘financial remedies’.
  • Asks whether the FPR could ever be aligned with the CPR.

This article addresses three questions about the modern state of family law:

(1) What or who is the ‘magic circle’ of family lawyers?

(2) What is the meaning of a ‘financial remedies court’?

(3) In 2022 (and a much more important debate than the other two), what are the realistic chances of alignment of the Family Procedure Rules with the Civil Procedure Rules 1998?

A first thing to assert is that the term ‘financial remedy’ does not exist in statute. It was made up by rule-makers in and approaching April 2011 when the new Family Procedure Rules 2010 (FPR 2010) came into operation. The terms approved in statute—rules

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll