header-logo header-logo

10 May 2012
Issue: 7513 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Olympic shutdown

Courts & tribunals near to Olympic venues to close

Courts and tribunals near Olympic venues are to close or offer a reduced service during the Games.

The Royal Courts of Justice will aim to complete trials in the week prior to the Games and will hear emergency applications only on 30 and 31 July.

The county courts at Bow and Woolwich will operate different session times.
The family proceedings court at Stratford will hear emergency orders only for the duration of the Games, while the service at the Inner London family proceedings court, at Wells Street, will be reduced to three courtrooms.

Tribunals will aim to avoid the Games period. Special arrangements will be made for hearings at the East London, Fox Court and Taylor House tribunals.

An HMCTS spokesperson says: “Most of the courts and tribunals in London will be operating normally during the Olympics, and will deal with all urgent applications and cases.

“We have only reduced court and tribunal sittings at those buildings close to Olympic venues and known travel hotspots and are in the process of rescheduling listings to ensure that any displaced work is dealt with either before or in the weeks immediately after the Games.”
 

Issue: 7513 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll