header-logo header-logo

On the (slow) march for reform

04 April 2019 / Athelstane Aamodt
Issue: 7835 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Athelstane Aamodt explains why gun control advocates have got their work cut out

The recent and tragic shootings at two mosques in New Zealand have caused Kiwis to re-assess their surprisingly relaxed laws of gun ownership. Indeed, there are estimated to be almost 1.5 million legally-owned firearms in New Zealand. The prime minister, Jacinda Ardern (pictured), has vowed to reform New Zealand’s laws and had cited the current laws as an example of ‘what not to do’.

Tragedies such as these shootings invariably provoke responses; the horror of Dunblane in 1996 caused the then government to enact the Firearms (Amendment) Act 1997, which banned all cartridge ammunition handguns with the exception of .22 calibre single-shot weapons in England, Scotland and Wales, and following the 1997 general election, the Labour government introduced the Firearms (Amendment) (No 2) Act 1997, banning the remaining .22 cartridge handguns. After the Port Arthur shootings in Australia in 1996 (the same year as Dunblane), the Australian government enacted the National Firearms Programme Implementation Act 1996, restricting the private

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
back-to-top-scroll