header-logo header-logo

On the receiving end

22 March 2019 / Cecily Crampin , Tricia Hemans
Issue: 7833 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Receivers & possession: Cecily Crampin & Tricia Hemans suggest looking past the agency device

  • Menon and Menon v Menon and Menon: can one sue oneself?

If tasked with running the argument that no man can sue himself, one might think oneself onto a winner. Surely it must be an irresistible submission that Mr and Mrs X could not possibly bring proceedings against Mr and Mrs X? However, when one factors in the Law of Property Act 1925, a mortgage and the appointment of receivers, one finds that such a submission may well get short shrift from the courts. This was the outcome of Menon and Menon (acting by Pask and Goode as joint fixed charge receivers) v Menon and Menon, 10 December 2018 (The County Court at Central London Unreported) where an argument that the Menons could not effectively sue themselves failed.

Typical

The case was typical of those involving receivers. The Menons were the registered proprietors of a west London property worth in the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll