header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
22 September 2023 / Julian Caddick
Issue: 8041 / Categories: Features , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail

Costs: On the wrong track?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
138470
Julian Caddick points out some unintentional consequences of fixed recoverable costs in non-litigated cases
  • The fixed recoverable costs (FRC) regime must offer greater guidance on non-litigated cases.
  • Without guidance, we will see costs arguments about which track the claim would have been allocated to and which band is appropriate.
  • The issue of costs-only proceedings and assessments in FRC cases is likely to increase. The answer lies in a revised pre-action protocol.

There are unintended consequences of the latest fixed recoverable costs (FRC) that could result in fewer cases being dealt with without court proceedings. Already in non-personal injury cases, some practitioners are being encouraged to issue proceedings before the 1 October 2023 deadline if they—and of course their clients—wish to avoid FRC. The consultation by the Ministry of Justice (21 July 2023) is welcome, but further consultation is needed to deal with the cases where the courts will not be involved, those that settle without proceedings, or prior to defence.

Valuing the claim

The starting point in non-issued

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Driving test fraudsters steer towards jail
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
NLJ this week: Deepfakes demand data law muscle
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
NLJ this week: 40% penalty for coercive control
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
NLJ this week: Mbappé row spotlights ‘ethics bonuses’
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
NLJ this week: Appeal court reins in ‘wrong defendant’ switcheroo

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll