header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us

Costs: On the wrong track?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2025. All Rights Reserved.
22 September 2023 / Julian Caddick
Issue: 8041 / Categories: Features , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail
138470
Julian Caddick points out some unintentional consequences of fixed recoverable costs in non-litigated cases
  • The fixed recoverable costs (FRC) regime must offer greater guidance on non-litigated cases.
  • Without guidance, we will see costs arguments about which track the claim would have been allocated to and which band is appropriate.
  • The issue of costs-only proceedings and assessments in FRC cases is likely to increase. The answer lies in a revised pre-action protocol.

There are unintended consequences of the latest fixed recoverable costs (FRC) that could result in fewer cases being dealt with without court proceedings. Already in non-personal injury cases, some practitioners are being encouraged to issue proceedings before the 1 October 2023 deadline if they—and of course their clients—wish to avoid FRC. The consultation by the Ministry of Justice (21 July 2023) is welcome, but further consultation is needed to deal with the cases where the courts will not be involved, those that settle without proceedings, or prior to defence.

Valuing the claim

The starting point in non-issued cases

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Law Society calls for clarity on AML
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
NLJ this week: Turning corporate liability into opportunity
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
NLJ this week: A prince no more?
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
NLJ this week: Shareholder secrecy sunk
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
NLJ this week: The expanding remit of national security law
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
Copyright © 2025 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll