header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
22 September 2023 / Julian Caddick
Issue: 8041 / Categories: Features , Profession , Costs
printer mail-detail

Costs: On the wrong track?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
138470
Julian Caddick points out some unintentional consequences of fixed recoverable costs in non-litigated cases
  • The fixed recoverable costs (FRC) regime must offer greater guidance on non-litigated cases.
  • Without guidance, we will see costs arguments about which track the claim would have been allocated to and which band is appropriate.
  • The issue of costs-only proceedings and assessments in FRC cases is likely to increase. The answer lies in a revised pre-action protocol.

There are unintended consequences of the latest fixed recoverable costs (FRC) that could result in fewer cases being dealt with without court proceedings. Already in non-personal injury cases, some practitioners are being encouraged to issue proceedings before the 1 October 2023 deadline if they—and of course their clients—wish to avoid FRC. The consultation by the Ministry of Justice (21 July 2023) is welcome, but further consultation is needed to deal with the cases where the courts will not be involved, those that settle without proceedings, or prior to defence.

Valuing the claim

The starting point in non-issued

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Switalskis—Naila Arif, Harriet Findlay & Ellie Thompson

Switalskis—Naila Arif, Harriet Findlay & Ellie Thompson

Firm awards training contracts to paralegals through internal programme

Ward Hadaway—Matthew Morton

Ward Hadaway—Matthew Morton

Private client disputes specialist joins commercial litigation team

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Nina Hood

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Nina Hood

Cumbria firm appoints new head of residential property

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
NLJ this week: Family law urged to ditch adversarial instincts
Family law must shift from conflict-driven litigation to child-centred problem-solving, according to a major new report. Writing in NLJ this week, Caroline Bowden of Anthony Gold outlines findings showing overwhelming support for reform, with 92% agreeing lawyers owe duties to children as well as clients
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll