header-logo header-logo

20 May 2020 / Jamie Sutherland , Imogen Dodds
Issue: 7887 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

One Flat, Two Guvnors

21121
Jamie Sutherland & Imogen Dodds consider overriding leases & enfranchisement
  • HHJ Hellman decides that the reversion in a flat lease is severed by the grant of an overriding lease.
  • Decision has important implications for lease extension claims under enfranchisement legislation.
  • Practitioners need to consider issues pending Court of Appeal decision.

Overriding leases of flats (also known as concurrent leases) are becoming increasingly common. These occur where the landlord of a flat let to an existing tenant grants a new (overriding) lease of the same flat to a different tenant, which takes effect subject to the existing tenant’s original lease, ie with the new tenant of the overriding lease becoming the existing tenant’s direct landlord of the flat. This can raise thorny questions for property practitioners, particularly where the tenant under the original lease seeks to exercise her right to a new lease under Pt I, Ch II of the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 (the 1993 Act).

In the recent decision in Lupin Limited v (1) 7-11

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll