header-logo header-logo

Online court woes

12 June 2019
Issue: 7844 / Categories: Legal News , Technology , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
Plans to establish an online court give ministers too much power, raising constitutional concerns, a parliamentary committee has warned

While ministers could specify that the online court be used only for civil claims valued up to £25,000, ‘nothing in the Bill limits the use of online procedures to such cases’, the Constitution Committee warned last week in its report on the Courts and Tribunals (Online Procedure) Bill.

The Bill could be used, for example, ‘to compel’ the use of online proceedings for everything but very high-value claims, and ‘many, or even all, civil, family, tribunal and employment proceedings’. Therefore, online courts could replace oral hearings in a far wider range of cases than anticipated.

Moreover, the Bill allows for procedural rules to be made that would compel the use of online proceedings, raising questions about the constitutional principle of access to justice. According to the Office for National Statistics, more than five million adults can be characterised as ‘non-internet-users’.

Issue: 7844 / Categories: Legal News , Technology , Procedure & practice
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
Transferring anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorism financing supervision to the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) could create extra paperwork and increase costs for clients, lawyers have warned 
In this week's NLJ, Bhavini Patel of Howard Kennedy LLP reports on Almacantar v De Valk [2025], a landmark Upper Tribunal ruling extending protection for leaseholders under the Building Safety Act 2022
Writing in NLJ this week, Hanna Basha and Jamie Hurworth of Payne Hicks Beach dissect TV chef John Torode’s startling decision to identify himself in a racism investigation he denied. In an age of ‘cancel culture’, they argue, self-disclosure can both protect and imperil reputations
As he steps down as Chancellor of the High Court, Sir Julian Flaux reflects on over 40 years in law, citing independence, impartiality and integrity as guiding principles. In a special interview with Grania Langdon-Down for NLJ, Sir Julian highlights morale, mentorship and openness as key to a thriving judiciary
Dinsdale v Fowell is a High Court case entangling bigamy, intestacy and modern family structures, examined in this week's NLJ by Shivi Rajput of Stowe Family Law
back-to-top-scroll