header-logo header-logo

12 June 2019
Issue: 7844 / Categories: Legal News , Technology , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Online court woes

Plans to establish an online court give ministers too much power, raising constitutional concerns, a parliamentary committee has warned

While ministers could specify that the online court be used only for civil claims valued up to £25,000, ‘nothing in the Bill limits the use of online procedures to such cases’, the Constitution Committee warned last week in its report on the Courts and Tribunals (Online Procedure) Bill.

The Bill could be used, for example, ‘to compel’ the use of online proceedings for everything but very high-value claims, and ‘many, or even all, civil, family, tribunal and employment proceedings’. Therefore, online courts could replace oral hearings in a far wider range of cases than anticipated.

Moreover, the Bill allows for procedural rules to be made that would compel the use of online proceedings, raising questions about the constitutional principle of access to justice. According to the Office for National Statistics, more than five million adults can be characterised as ‘non-internet-users’.

Issue: 7844 / Categories: Legal News , Technology , Procedure & practice
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll