header-logo header-logo

12 June 2019
Issue: 7844 / Categories: Legal News , Technology , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Online court woes

Plans to establish an online court give ministers too much power, raising constitutional concerns, a parliamentary committee has warned

While ministers could specify that the online court be used only for civil claims valued up to £25,000, ‘nothing in the Bill limits the use of online procedures to such cases’, the Constitution Committee warned last week in its report on the Courts and Tribunals (Online Procedure) Bill.

The Bill could be used, for example, ‘to compel’ the use of online proceedings for everything but very high-value claims, and ‘many, or even all, civil, family, tribunal and employment proceedings’. Therefore, online courts could replace oral hearings in a far wider range of cases than anticipated.

Moreover, the Bill allows for procedural rules to be made that would compel the use of online proceedings, raising questions about the constitutional principle of access to justice. According to the Office for National Statistics, more than five million adults can be characterised as ‘non-internet-users’.

Issue: 7844 / Categories: Legal News , Technology , Procedure & practice
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Kevin Joynes & Neil Gosling

Clarke Willmott—Kevin Joynes & Neil Gosling

Clarke Willmott bolsters housebuilder expertise in Birmingham

Carpmaels & Ransford—Kevin Cordina

Carpmaels & Ransford—Kevin Cordina

Firm adds former Simmons Simmons patent head to engineering and tech team

ACTAPS—Sally Goodger

ACTAPS—Sally Goodger

Freeths strengthens its voice in national disputes with ACTAPS committee appointment

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll