header-logo header-logo

Online court woes

12 June 2019
Issue: 7844 / Categories: Legal News , Technology , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
Plans to establish an online court give ministers too much power, raising constitutional concerns, a parliamentary committee has warned

While ministers could specify that the online court be used only for civil claims valued up to £25,000, ‘nothing in the Bill limits the use of online procedures to such cases’, the Constitution Committee warned last week in its report on the Courts and Tribunals (Online Procedure) Bill.

The Bill could be used, for example, ‘to compel’ the use of online proceedings for everything but very high-value claims, and ‘many, or even all, civil, family, tribunal and employment proceedings’. Therefore, online courts could replace oral hearings in a far wider range of cases than anticipated.

Moreover, the Bill allows for procedural rules to be made that would compel the use of online proceedings, raising questions about the constitutional principle of access to justice. According to the Office for National Statistics, more than five million adults can be characterised as ‘non-internet-users’.

Issue: 7844 / Categories: Legal News , Technology , Procedure & practice
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll