header-logo header-logo

Online justice: faster, more efficient, more unequal?

16 June 2017 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7750 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

The government should take care not to be captivated by the magic of technology, says Geoffrey Bindman

A few weeks ago, I expressed doubts about the proposed online court for which preparations are well advanced in the Prisons and Courts Bill (see ‘Law and the Human Element’ , NLJ 10 March 2017). My main concern is the diminished role for trained human specialist advisers, ie lawyers. The likelihood is that only those who can afford to pay lawyers—the corporations and institutional parties to the litigation—will have them, perpetuating the inequality which undermines our justice system. My doubts have been reinforced by the collapse of the Dutch Rechtwijzer scheme, the pioneer in online dispute resolution to which the UK proposals owe their inspiration (see ‘Digital law crashes out…for now,’ Steve Hynes, NLJ , 28 April 2017,
p 7). More of that below.

Naturally I welcome efficiencies and economies which new technology can bring to many situations. The onward march of science continues to bring benefits. The development of robotics and artificial

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll