header-logo header-logo

16 June 2017 / Sir Geoffrey Bindman KC
Issue: 7750 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Online justice: faster, more efficient, more unequal?

The government should take care not to be captivated by the magic of technology, says Geoffrey Bindman

A few weeks ago, I expressed doubts about the proposed online court for which preparations are well advanced in the Prisons and Courts Bill (see ‘Law and the Human Element’ , NLJ 10 March 2017). My main concern is the diminished role for trained human specialist advisers, ie lawyers. The likelihood is that only those who can afford to pay lawyers—the corporations and institutional parties to the litigation—will have them, perpetuating the inequality which undermines our justice system. My doubts have been reinforced by the collapse of the Dutch Rechtwijzer scheme, the pioneer in online dispute resolution to which the UK proposals owe their inspiration (see ‘Digital law crashes out…for now,’ Steve Hynes, NLJ , 28 April 2017,
p 7). More of that below.

Naturally I welcome efficiencies and economies which new technology can bring to many situations. The onward march of science continues to bring benefits. The development of robotics and artificial

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team

NEWS
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

back-to-top-scroll