header-logo header-logo

Online safety: staying flexible

244399

The law must keep pace with technological change but shouldn’t be reactive, write Alexander Brown & Alexandra Webster

Since the start of the year, we have seen concerns about the disproportionate impact of online harms on women and children drive a raft of proposed new legislative measures.

These are intended to plug perceived gaps in the current regulatory regime and include:

  • new criminal offences targeting use of emerging technologies such as ‘nudification’ apps to create non-consensual intimate images (NCII);
  • proposals to designate cyberflashing and the creation of NCII as ‘priority offences’ under the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023); and
  • blocks on social media access or restrictions on design features for under-16s.

These proposals have been tabled at a pivotal moment. OSA 2023, though on the statute book for some years, remains in the early stages of phased implementation and enforcement. In particular, measures that require platforms to identify and address illegal content, including content that poses risks to women and children, have been

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll