header-logo header-logo

Online safety: staying flexible

244399

The law must keep pace with technological change but shouldn’t be reactive, write Alexander Brown & Alexandra Webster

Since the start of the year, we have seen concerns about the disproportionate impact of online harms on women and children drive a raft of proposed new legislative measures.

These are intended to plug perceived gaps in the current regulatory regime and include:

  • new criminal offences targeting use of emerging technologies such as ‘nudification’ apps to create non-consensual intimate images (NCII);
  • proposals to designate cyberflashing and the creation of NCII as ‘priority offences’ under the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023); and
  • blocks on social media access or restrictions on design features for under-16s.

These proposals have been tabled at a pivotal moment. OSA 2023, though on the statute book for some years, remains in the early stages of phased implementation and enforcement. In particular, measures that require platforms to identify and address illegal content, including content that poses risks to women and children, have been

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers—Sophie Barrett-Brown

Withers drives further growth in its UK immigration team with new partner Sophie Barrett-Brown

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal—Esther Amoako

Venus Legal invests in next generation of legal talent as specialist litigation practice grows

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips—Catrina Smith

Fisher Phillips continues momentum in London with arrival of Catrina Smith

NEWS
Restrictions on workplace non-disclosure agreements could make settlements slower, more complex and more expensive when reforms expected in 2027 take effect
Private prosecutors face closer scrutiny under Crown Prosecution Service guidance designed to strengthen accountability and consistency when intervention is requested
Foreign states cannot necessarily claim immunity for cyber operations launched abroad against computers in Britain, following a divided Supreme Court ruling
Defendants who make unsupported complaints about their lawyers risk losing legal aid while confiscation proceedings continue without representation
Lawyers advising Russian clients face different sanctions restrictions across the UK, EU and US, despite their shared objective of increasing pressure on Russia
back-to-top-scroll