header-logo header-logo

13 December 2012
Issue: 7542 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Ontrack with legal highs & lows

The Jackson effect, BYOD & dawn raids dominate legal trends

The risks of employees using their own smartphone for work, the Jackson “Big Bang” reforms, and a tough regulatory climate are some of the key trends of 2012 highlighted by this year’s Kroll Ontrack review.

The costs of civil litigation were in the spotlight this year, with senior judges voicing concerns about the high costs involved in bringing an action, the Jackson reforms, and the case of Sylvia Henry v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2012] EWHC 90218 (Costs), which found that lawyers are vulnerable if they don’t have a reliable method of monitoring adherence to budgets.

Concerns over how to protect company data where employees use their iPads, iPhones, smartphones and tablets (the “bring your own device” (BYOD) phenomenon) have been a big issue for companies this year, according to the review, which identifies the key legal trends of the year. A BYOD strategy is seen as essential for next year to protect corporate data, comply with data-protection laws and preserve electronic information in case of regulatory investigation.

“Dawn raid” training is becoming increasingly popular as companies find that regulatory investigations hit them out of the blue. The review also points out that regulatory changes in data-protection and competition law this year mean companies should continue to take a proactive approach to risk avoidance and compliance.

Martin Carey, managing director of legal technologies at Kroll Ontrack, says: “Court-led changes are underway which will have a significant effect on litigation in the UK, and legislative and structural changes will impact on regulatory enforcement activity across Europe. At the same time, new consumer-led technology is re-shaping the way in which business is conducted and all companies need to respond strategically.”

Issue: 7542 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers to be joined by leading family law set, 4 Brick Court, this summer

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Real estate and construction energy offering boosted by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Firm bolsters real estate team with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll