header-logo header-logo

Open bar

02 August 2007 / Duncan Matthews
Issue: 7284 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Excellence, not exclusivity, should be equated with the Bar, says Duncan Matthews QC

The Bar has long been committed to recruitment on merit alone, without regard to matters which are irrelevant to performance and unfairly discriminatory. Discrimination in recruitment on grounds of such matters as sex, race, religion are not only illegal and contrary to the Bar’s Code of Conduct; they are also counter-productive in building a strong profession. There is a perception that there are barriers to entry to the Bar which operate unfairly to discourage some good candidates.

In recognition of this, the Bar Council, with the active support of the Inns of Court, established the Entry to the Bar Working Party, chaired by Lord Neuberger, in late 2006 to investigate how to reduce barriers to entry for minority and socially and economically disadvantaged students. In this context, a perceived barrier is as damaging as a real barrier, not least to the extent that it deters good candidates from applying to the Bar.

INEQUALITIES

There are certain barriers which it is extremely difficult,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll