header-logo header-logo

02 August 2007 / Duncan Matthews
Issue: 7284 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Open bar

Excellence, not exclusivity, should be equated with the Bar, says Duncan Matthews QC

The Bar has long been committed to recruitment on merit alone, without regard to matters which are irrelevant to performance and unfairly discriminatory. Discrimination in recruitment on grounds of such matters as sex, race, religion are not only illegal and contrary to the Bar’s Code of Conduct; they are also counter-productive in building a strong profession. There is a perception that there are barriers to entry to the Bar which operate unfairly to discourage some good candidates.

In recognition of this, the Bar Council, with the active support of the Inns of Court, established the Entry to the Bar Working Party, chaired by Lord Neuberger, in late 2006 to investigate how to reduce barriers to entry for minority and socially and economically disadvantaged students. In this context, a perceived barrier is as damaging as a real barrier, not least to the extent that it deters good candidates from applying to the Bar.

INEQUALITIES

There are certain barriers which it is extremely difficult,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll