header-logo header-logo

Open bar

02 August 2007 / Duncan Matthews
Issue: 7284 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Excellence, not exclusivity, should be equated with the Bar, says Duncan Matthews QC

The Bar has long been committed to recruitment on merit alone, without regard to matters which are irrelevant to performance and unfairly discriminatory. Discrimination in recruitment on grounds of such matters as sex, race, religion are not only illegal and contrary to the Bar’s Code of Conduct; they are also counter-productive in building a strong profession. There is a perception that there are barriers to entry to the Bar which operate unfairly to discourage some good candidates.

In recognition of this, the Bar Council, with the active support of the Inns of Court, established the Entry to the Bar Working Party, chaired by Lord Neuberger, in late 2006 to investigate how to reduce barriers to entry for minority and socially and economically disadvantaged students. In this context, a perceived barrier is as damaging as a real barrier, not least to the extent that it deters good candidates from applying to the Bar.

INEQUALITIES

There are certain barriers which it is extremely difficult,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
back-to-top-scroll