header-logo header-logo

Opening old wounds

27 May 2010 / Karen O’Sullivan
Issue: 7419 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Karen O’Sullivan considers the nuances of s 33 discretion in sex abuse cases

Too many children, often the most vulnerable in society, have been the victims of institutionalised sexual abuse at the hands of those entrusted to care for them. The law has been slow to respond and up until the 2008 landmark decision of A v Hoare [2008] UKHL 6, [2008] 2 All ER 1, sexual abuse was classified as a deliberate assault. As such the limitation period was six years, with no discretion for the court to extend this period. This fixed limitation period resulted in significant injustice to victims, who would often bury their experience of childhood abuse for many years. When victims of abuse eventually took legal advice they would often find their claims statute barred.

A v Hoare held that the Limitation Act 1980, s 11 applies to a personal injury claim arising from a sexual assault. As such the usual limitation period is three years from the date the cause of action accrued or the “date of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—19 appointments

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll