header-logo header-logo

27 May 2010 / Karen O’Sullivan
Issue: 7419 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Opening old wounds

Karen O’Sullivan considers the nuances of s 33 discretion in sex abuse cases

Too many children, often the most vulnerable in society, have been the victims of institutionalised sexual abuse at the hands of those entrusted to care for them. The law has been slow to respond and up until the 2008 landmark decision of A v Hoare [2008] UKHL 6, [2008] 2 All ER 1, sexual abuse was classified as a deliberate assault. As such the limitation period was six years, with no discretion for the court to extend this period. This fixed limitation period resulted in significant injustice to victims, who would often bury their experience of childhood abuse for many years. When victims of abuse eventually took legal advice they would often find their claims statute barred.

A v Hoare held that the Limitation Act 1980, s 11 applies to a personal injury claim arising from a sexual assault. As such the usual limitation period is three years from the date the cause of action accrued or the “date of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll