header-logo header-logo

27 May 2010 / Karen O’Sullivan
Issue: 7419 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , LexisPSL
printer mail-detail

Opening old wounds

Karen O’Sullivan considers the nuances of s 33 discretion in sex abuse cases

Too many children, often the most vulnerable in society, have been the victims of institutionalised sexual abuse at the hands of those entrusted to care for them. The law has been slow to respond and up until the 2008 landmark decision of A v Hoare [2008] UKHL 6, [2008] 2 All ER 1, sexual abuse was classified as a deliberate assault. As such the limitation period was six years, with no discretion for the court to extend this period. This fixed limitation period resulted in significant injustice to victims, who would often bury their experience of childhood abuse for many years. When victims of abuse eventually took legal advice they would often find their claims statute barred.

A v Hoare held that the Limitation Act 1980, s 11 applies to a personal injury claim arising from a sexual assault. As such the usual limitation period is three years from the date the cause of action accrued or the “date of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll