header-logo header-logo

26 November 2009 / Dr Clare Mcconnell
Issue: 7395 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Opportunity knocks

Dr Clare McConnell assesses the threats & challenges facing law firms

Law firms are facing a number of unrelenting challenges. They continue to suffer the effects of the credit crunch and are having to change the way they do business to meet the ever increasing demands from clients to provide better value for money.

For many, responding to these challenges and changes will be difficult. Those who do so will put themselves in a strong position to capitalise on the upturn in the economy when it happens.

What are the key issues being faced? There are many. Some of the most significant ones are: the need to cut cost base; and the threat of competition from other professional service providers where the advice required is not a reserved legal matter, such as corporate—commercial advice. 

The need to cut cost base

At present law firms’ profits are being adversely affected. We have all read stories in the legal press highlighting this and reporting on some firms making cash calls on their partners.

The response

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
In this week’s NLJ, Fred Philpott, Gough Square Chambers, invites us to imagine there was no statutory limitation. What would that world be like?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll