header-logo header-logo

24 July 2013 / Mark Solon
Issue: 7570 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail

In our estimation

Mark Solon reviews the new costs regime for expert witnesses

Builders do it. Car mechanics do it. And now expert witnesses have to provide costs estimates, under the revised Civil Procedure Rules which came into effect in April following Lord Justice Jackson’s report into civil litigation costs.~

Experts comfortable with the old regime may be perplexed by the demands of estimating how much to budget for assessment, research, report-writing, travel, meetings, questions and court appearances. Meanwhile the court enjoys new powers to reduce fees deemed to be disproportionate. Is it worth being an expert witness?

Business time

Some committed experts are upbeat: they can run their operations more like a business—offering fixed and capped fees, for example—and cherry-pick the most profitable work. If they can help solicitors give a costs estimate and identify the key issues, they won’t be pricing themselves out of the market—they are more likely to be employed. Those appointed as a single joint expert, working on behalf of both sides, will be able to earn higher rates

Experts baulking

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll