header-logo header-logo

08 September 2023 / Dante Quaglione
Issue: 8039 / Categories: Features , Profession , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Our survey says…

136482
Dante Quaglione explains the importance of impartiality & transparency in survey evidence in civil actions
  • Surveys are being used increasingly in civil litigation, particularly in class certification, antitrust, intellectual property, employment class actions and false advertising cases.
  • Pointers on how to make survey evidence robust and therefore acceptable to the court.

Surveys have been gaining prominence across a range of civil litigation actions and are being used increasingly in class certification, antitrust cases and intellectual property matters (eg trademark infringement proceedings), as well as in employment-related class actions.

They also have become common in false advertising cases, as they can provide two types of key evidence: in cases in which the advertising is literally false, surveys often provide evidence on the materiality of the claim; and in cases in which the claim is not literally false but potentially misleading, surveys can provide evidence as to consumers’ perceptions of the claims.

The Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT), a specialist tribunal with the jurisdiction to hear competition damages actions, is becoming more comfortable

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll