header-logo header-logo

08 September 2023 / Dante Quaglione
Issue: 8039 / Categories: Features , Profession , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Our survey says…

136482
Dante Quaglione explains the importance of impartiality & transparency in survey evidence in civil actions
  • Surveys are being used increasingly in civil litigation, particularly in class certification, antitrust, intellectual property, employment class actions and false advertising cases.
  • Pointers on how to make survey evidence robust and therefore acceptable to the court.

Surveys have been gaining prominence across a range of civil litigation actions and are being used increasingly in class certification, antitrust cases and intellectual property matters (eg trademark infringement proceedings), as well as in employment-related class actions.

They also have become common in false advertising cases, as they can provide two types of key evidence: in cases in which the advertising is literally false, surveys often provide evidence on the materiality of the claim; and in cases in which the claim is not literally false but potentially misleading, surveys can provide evidence as to consumers’ perceptions of the claims.

The Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT), a specialist tribunal with the jurisdiction to hear competition damages actions, is becoming more comfortable

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Elborne Mitchell & Myton Law

Weightmans—Elborne Mitchell & Myton Law

Firm expands in London and Leeds with dual merger

Boodle Hatfield—Clare Pooley & Michael Duffy

Boodle Hatfield—Clare Pooley & Michael Duffy

Private wealth and real estate firmpromotes two to partner and five to senior associate

Constantine Law—James Baker & Julie Goodway

Constantine Law—James Baker & Julie Goodway

Agile firm expands employment team with two partner hires

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll