header-logo header-logo

09 March 2007 / Paul Dobson
Issue: 7263 / Categories: Features , Regulatory , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Out in the cold

Farepak’s collapse shows why legislation is urgently needed to protect pre-payments, says Paul Dobson

Section 8 of the Enterprise Act 2002 (EnA 2002) gives authority to the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) to make arrangements under which it can give its formal approval to codes of practice containing provisions for the protection of consumers. This section requires the OFT to specify criteria that it will apply in deciding whether to grant or withdraw such approval.

The OFT got off to a flying start and, while EnA 2002 was still only a Bill, consulted upon and then published the core criteria for its Consumer Codes Approval Scheme (CCAS). There must be hundreds of consumer codes operating in the UK economy. Yet, nearly five years after EnA 2002 was passed, there are still only six consumer codes that have achieved approval status, and one of those has since been withdrawn from the scheme by its sponsor.

Why are there so few? In large part, the answer is that for most sponsors and their member

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll