header-logo header-logo

09 March 2007 / Paul Dobson
Issue: 7263 / Categories: Features , Regulatory , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Out in the cold

Farepak’s collapse shows why legislation is urgently needed to protect pre-payments, says Paul Dobson

Section 8 of the Enterprise Act 2002 (EnA 2002) gives authority to the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) to make arrangements under which it can give its formal approval to codes of practice containing provisions for the protection of consumers. This section requires the OFT to specify criteria that it will apply in deciding whether to grant or withdraw such approval.

The OFT got off to a flying start and, while EnA 2002 was still only a Bill, consulted upon and then published the core criteria for its Consumer Codes Approval Scheme (CCAS). There must be hundreds of consumer codes operating in the UK economy. Yet, nearly five years after EnA 2002 was passed, there are still only six consumer codes that have achieved approval status, and one of those has since been withdrawn from the scheme by its sponsor.

Why are there so few? In large part, the answer is that for most sponsors and their member

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll