header-logo header-logo

03 April 2008 / David Allison
Issue: 7315 / Categories: Features , Public , Human rights , Property
printer mail-detail

Out of step

The government is wrong to delay cohabitation reforms, says David Allison

On 6 March the government finally announced its response to the Law Commission’s report Cohabitation: The Financial Consequences of Relationship Breakdown. As this was outside the usual six-month period within which, by convention, the government responds to Law Commission reports we might have expected a thorough and considered response and some firm proposals for implementation. Instead what we got was a “whitewash” from a government too scared of the tabloids and the “old guard” to implement a piece of progressive legislation that is desperately needed. I don’t forget of course that this is the same government that implemented the Civil Partnerships Act 2004, arguably one of the most progressive pieces of legislation of its time. But, of course, that was under pressure from . Without that pressure it seems that this government is not willing to act.

Why do I say a “whitewash”? In her written ministerial statement Justice Minister Bridget Prentice said that the report had been carefully

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll