header-logo header-logo

02 March 2018 / David Willink
Issue: 7783 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Out of time?

nlj_7783_willink

David Willink reports on a short but interesting & not unimportant point on the law of limitation

  • High Court considers limitation when cause of action accrues at midnight.

In Matthew & Ors v Sedman & Ors [2017] EWHC 3527 (Ch) the High Court considered when a limitation period ended in circumstances where the cause of action had accrued on the stroke of midnight. When a cause of action accrues during the course of a day, that day is disregarded for limitation purposes and the clock is said to start ticking from the start of the following day. In this case, the cause of action accrued at midnight.

The court accordingly had to address the question ‘when a cause of action is completely constituted at the very first moment of a particular day, does that day fall to be included when calculating the applicable…limitation period or does it fall to be excluded?’ The court decided that, if it is ‘absolutely clear that the cause of action arises at the very beginning of a particular

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hugh James—Jonathan Askin

Hugh James—Jonathan Askin

London corporate and commercial team announces partner appointment

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Michelman Robinson—Daniel Burbeary

Firm names partner as London office managing partner

Kingsley Napley—Jonathan Grimes

Kingsley Napley—Jonathan Grimes

Firm appoints new head of criminal litigation team

NEWS
Personal injury lawyers have welcomed a government U-turn on a ‘substantial prejudice’ defence that risked enabling defendants in child sexual abuse civil cases to have proceedings against them dropped
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
back-to-top-scroll