header-logo header-logo

Over the limit?

20 November 2014 / David Locke
Issue: 7631 / Categories: Features , Human rights , Criminal
printer mail-detail
carousel_cover

Is the criminalisation of excessive alcohol consumption during pregnancy possible, asks David Locke

The Court of Appeal is currently considering its judgment in what some seek to portray as a landmark case. It is, however, no more than another footnote in what is a philosophical, moral and legal debate of many years standing, in this jurisdiction and others.

The appeal is an attempt to secure criminal injuries compensation for a child born with foetal alcohol syndrome, as a result of alcohol consumption by the mother during pregnancy. To obtain such compensation it is necessary for the child to be classified as the victim of a crime, committed when it was a foetus. Moreover, it is necessary for the consumption of alcohol during pregnancy to constitute a criminal offence, in the particular circumstances.

The court will hand down its judgment in due course, but in the interim the supposed implications are providing fertile ground for discussion and no little misunderstanding.

The foetus as a victim

The position under the criminal law was considered comprehensively

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll