header-logo header-logo

20 November 2014 / David Locke
Issue: 7631 / Categories: Features , Human rights , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Over the limit?

carousel_cover

Is the criminalisation of excessive alcohol consumption during pregnancy possible, asks David Locke

The Court of Appeal is currently considering its judgment in what some seek to portray as a landmark case. It is, however, no more than another footnote in what is a philosophical, moral and legal debate of many years standing, in this jurisdiction and others.

The appeal is an attempt to secure criminal injuries compensation for a child born with foetal alcohol syndrome, as a result of alcohol consumption by the mother during pregnancy. To obtain such compensation it is necessary for the child to be classified as the victim of a crime, committed when it was a foetus. Moreover, it is necessary for the consumption of alcohol during pregnancy to constitute a criminal offence, in the particular circumstances.

The court will hand down its judgment in due course, but in the interim the supposed implications are providing fertile ground for discussion and no little misunderstanding.

The foetus as a victim

The position under the criminal law was considered comprehensively

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll