header-logo header-logo

27 February 2025
Issue: 8106 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Overhaul of CCRC part of wide-ranging changes suggested for appeals

The Law Commission has proposed sweeping reforms to the criminal appeals process, including changing the ‘real possibility’ test used by the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC).

Its consultation on criminal appeals, published this week, addresses concerns that the test blocks some miscarriages of justice from being corrected and is too deferential to the appeal court.

Professor Penney Lewis, Commissioner for Criminal Law, said: ‘We received persuasive evidence that the “real possibility” test used by the CCRC may lead the CCRC to focus its investigations too narrowly and so neglect lines of inquiry that might exonerate a person.

‘Rather than focusing on what the appeal court may do, we think the CCRC should first form its own view as to whether a conviction may be unsafe.’

Where the wrongly convicted seek compensation, they must prove their innocence beyond reasonable doubt, which Professor Lewis warned ‘can present an insurmountable obstacle’. The Law Commission suggests a civil standard of proof be used instead.

It also proposes establishing an independent inspectorate for the CCRC. It would also increase the courts’ and CCRC’s powers to investigate claims a conviction is unsafe due to misconduct by jurors, remove the ‘case stated’ procedure in summary proceedings, and abolish the requirement for Court of Appeal certification so more appeals reach the Supreme Court.

Professor Lewis said: ‘As the Post Office scandal has demonstrated, anyone can be a victim of a miscarriage of justice.’

The Law Commission also seeks views on the time limits for lodging an appeal, and the composition and terms of appointment of CCRC Commissioners. It asks whether the Unduly Lenient Sentence scheme should be expanded to cover offences such as causing death by careless driving and animal cruelty, and whether to expand the range of situations where an acquitted person can be retried due to compelling new evidence.

It asks for views on whether it should be lawful to disclose evidence for the purposes of responsible journalism to reveal a possible miscarriage of justice. Finally, it proposes establishing a National Forensic Archive Service for the long-term storage of evidence used in trials. The consultation ends on 30 May.

Issue: 8106 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Wedlake Bell—Rebecca Christie

Firm welcomes partner with specialist expertise in family and art law

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Birketts—Álvaro Aznar

Dual-qualified partner joins international private client team

NEWS
Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

back-to-top-scroll