header-logo header-logo

17 September 2025
Issue: 8131 / Categories: Legal News , Child law , Public , Local authority , Community care , Health
printer mail-detail

Overhauling support for disabled children

The current ‘postcode lottery’ of support for more than half a million disabled children in England could be replaced with clearer rights and national eligibility criteria, under Law Commission proposals

The commission recommends sweeping changes in its 220-page paper, ‘Disabled children’s social care: final report’, published this week after a two-year review and consultation.

It calls for a unified legal framework with nationally-set rather than locally-set criteria governing whether a disabled child gets support from social services, what help they get and how they get it. This would be accompanied by comprehensive guidance setting out the rights and responsibilities of children, families and local authorities.

Current Children Act 1989 protections would be retained, and a discrete set of rights and entitlements added to the Act.

Disabled children would be given express rights to request social care assessments and provided with independent advocacy when needed. The commission also wants to strengthen cooperation between health, education and social care services, particularly during transition planning to adulthood.

Currently, parents, carers and local authorities must navigate an assortment of legislation dating back to the 1970s and 1980s. According to the commission, this not only makes accessing support unnecessarily complicated but has resulted in children in some parts of the country being given support while children in other parts with identical needs are not. Many of the legal definitions are now out of date: for example, the definition of ‘disability’ dates from the Second World War.

Alison Young, Commissioner for Public Law, said: ‘These recommendations represent a crucial step towards ensuring disabled children receive the support they need, when they need it, regardless of where they live.

‘Our proposals would create a simpler, fairer and more accessible framework that puts the child’s best interests at the heart of decision-making whilst maintaining vital protections.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

International arbitration team strengthened by double partner hire

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Firm celebrates trio holding senior regional law society and junior lawyers division roles

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Partner joins commercial and business litigation team in London

NEWS
The government has pledged to ‘move fast’ to protect children from harm caused by artificial intelligence (AI) chatbots, and could impose limits on social media as early as the summer
All eyes will be on the Court of Appeal (or its YouTube livestream) next week as it sits to consider the controversial Mazur judgment
An NHS Foundation Trust breached a consultant’s contract by delegating an investigation into his knowledge of nurse Lucy Letby’s case
Draft guidance for schools on how to support gender-questioning pupils provides ‘more clarity’, but headteachers may still need legal advice, an education lawyer has said
Litigation funder Innsworth Capital, which funded behemoth opt-out action Merricks v Mastercard, can bring a judicial review, the High Court ruled last week
back-to-top-scroll