header-logo header-logo

17 September 2025
Issue: 8131 / Categories: Legal News , Child law , Public , Local authority , Community care , Health
printer mail-detail

Overhauling support for disabled children

The current ‘postcode lottery’ of support for more than half a million disabled children in England could be replaced with clearer rights and national eligibility criteria, under Law Commission proposals

The commission recommends sweeping changes in its 220-page paper, ‘Disabled children’s social care: final report’, published this week after a two-year review and consultation.

It calls for a unified legal framework with nationally-set rather than locally-set criteria governing whether a disabled child gets support from social services, what help they get and how they get it. This would be accompanied by comprehensive guidance setting out the rights and responsibilities of children, families and local authorities.

Current Children Act 1989 protections would be retained, and a discrete set of rights and entitlements added to the Act.

Disabled children would be given express rights to request social care assessments and provided with independent advocacy when needed. The commission also wants to strengthen cooperation between health, education and social care services, particularly during transition planning to adulthood.

Currently, parents, carers and local authorities must navigate an assortment of legislation dating back to the 1970s and 1980s. According to the commission, this not only makes accessing support unnecessarily complicated but has resulted in children in some parts of the country being given support while children in other parts with identical needs are not. Many of the legal definitions are now out of date: for example, the definition of ‘disability’ dates from the Second World War.

Alison Young, Commissioner for Public Law, said: ‘These recommendations represent a crucial step towards ensuring disabled children receive the support they need, when they need it, regardless of where they live.

‘Our proposals would create a simpler, fairer and more accessible framework that puts the child’s best interests at the heart of decision-making whilst maintaining vital protections.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll