Overstepping the mark on indefinite retention

29 April 2020 / Michael Zander KC

Issue: 7884 / Categories: Features , Human rights , Privacy

Michael Zander reports on a new (definitely unwanted) problem for the government

In brief

The Gaughran decision will require changes in the retention rules in England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland.

On February 13, the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) unanimously upheld Mr Fergus Gaughran’s claim that he had suffered an unlawful interference in his private and family life under Article 8 of the Convention by the indefinite retention of his DNA profile, fingerprints and photograph (Gaughran v United Kingdom (App No 45245/15), [2020] All ER (D) 78 (Feb)).

In 2008, twelve years ago, Mr Gaughran was arrested in Northern Ireland for the recordable (ie imprisonable) offence of driving with excess alcohol. He pleaded guilty, was fined £50 and disqualified from driving for 12 months. His DNA sample was destroyed in 2015 in line with the ECHR ruling in S and Marper v UK [2008] ECHR 1581, but the Northern Ireland Police Service (PSNI) did not agree

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

Overstepping the mark on indefinite retention

Michael Zander reports on a new (definitely unwanted) problem for the government

In brief

The Gaughran decision will require changes in the retention rules in England and Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS

Read All

NLJ this week: Cyber drills build real-world resilience

Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week

NLJ this week: Fairness from day one

In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims

NLJ this week: When procedure is power

Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power

NLJ this week: Jury still trusted—Crown Court study revisited

Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ

NLJ this week: AI copyright clash

Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week

Error message

Overstepping the mark on indefinite retention

In brief

In brief

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning