header-logo header-logo

Owens: a dead marriage but no divorce

31 March 2017 / David Burrows
Issue: 7740 / Categories: Opinion , Divorce , Family
printer mail-detail
nlj_7740_burrows

A consideration of Parliamentary intent & a deductive approach could have helped ensure Mrs Owens got her way, says David Burrows

It is difficult not to feel sorry for Mrs Owens: locked in a dead marriage and blocked from divorce by a narrow view of the legal issue (Owens v Owens [2017] EWCA Civ 182). As Hallett LJ said (§102): “On any view, the marriage is over.” In the course of a 98-paragraph judgment Sir James Munby P said: “[84] …unless [Mrs Owens] can bring herself within the ‘no fault’ provisions of s 1(2)(d) and (e) [living apart for two years (with consent) or five years] she must remain trapped in her loveless marriage…Parliament has decreed that it is not a ground for divorce that you find yourself in a wretchedly unhappy marriage, though some people may say it should be.”

Is this what Parliament intended? Did Parliament really say that irretrievable breakdown might not lead to divorce? These were not questions the Court of Appeal judges asked. They

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Twenty Essex—Professor Payam Akhavan

Twenty Essex—Professor Payam Akhavan

Chambers deepens international law bench with leading global advocate

Asserson—Adele Merifield, Sangiwe Mbele & Moishe Noe

Asserson—Adele Merifield, Sangiwe Mbele & Moishe Noe

Trio of hires in real estate and dispute resolution teams in Manchester

Lake Legal—Hollie Burnett

Lake Legal—Hollie Burnett

Family law firm appoints partner in Leeds

NEWS
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
Lawyers can no longer afford to ignore the metaverse, says Jacqueline Watts of Allin1 Advisory in this week's NLJ. Far from being a passing tech fad, virtual platforms like Roblox host thriving economies and social interactions, raising real legal issues
back-to-top-scroll