header-logo header-logo

Paper-online fees alignment ‘unfair’

14 December 2020
Categories: Legal News , Costs , Profession , In Court
printer mail-detail
Ministers’ proposals to align online and paper civil court fees are ‘unfair’, ‘unjustifiable’, will ‘damage UK businesses’ and restrict access to justice, the Civil Court Users Association (CCUA) has warned

Robert Thompson, chair of the CCUA (whose membership issue about 85% of all civil money claims), gave a scathing response this week to the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) ‘Consultation on alignment of the fees for online and paper civil money and possession claims’, which ends on 30 December.

According to the MoJ, the alignment would ‘simplify our fee structure’, and raise an estimated £12m-£33m per annum from 2022/23 onwards, while ensuring that those who may not be able to access online services are not charged more for using the paper route. Moreover, it would help fill the financial gap between the annual net fee income of £724m against the £2bn running costs of HM Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS).

However, Thompson said these figures were ‘misleading’ as they related to the whole service, including family and criminal courts, whereas the proposal was to increase civil claim fees only. He said HMCTS had previously confirmed to the CCUA that, in 2018/19, civil claim fees produced £561m while providing the service cost £475m.

Thompson said: ‘It is not right that court users currently pay more than the service costs, only to then receive a sub-standard service, whilst the additional sums are spent elsewhere.

The highest fee for simply issuing a claim form stands at £10,000, calculated upon the size of the claim. Fees of this size for such a simple procedural step are simply unjustifiable on any basis.’

He warned the proposals would encourage legal action against someone who owes a small amount of money but discourage it where large sums were involved. He said this restriction on access to justice would create extra cost for UK business and, ultimately, the consumer.

Categories: Legal News , Costs , Profession , In Court
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—19 appointments

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Steven Ball of Red Lion Chambers unpacks how advances in forensic science finally unmasked Ryland Headley, jailed in 2025 for the 1967 rape and murder of 75-year-old Louisa Dunne. Preserved swabs and palm prints lay dormant for decades until DNA-17 profiling produced a billion-to-one match
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Rylatt and Robyn Laye of Anthony Gold Solicitors examine recent international relocation cases where allegations of domestic abuse shaped outcomes
back-to-top-scroll