header-logo header-logo

02 July 2019 / Amanda Hamilton , Jane Robson
Issue: 7847 / Categories: Features , Profession , Legal services , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Paralegal regulation—confidence & competence

Amanda Hamilton & Jane Robson explain why self-regulation for paralegals promotes access to justice & benefits the sector as a whole

  • Why paralegals are not regulated by statute and the benefits of self-regulation.

It comes as no surprise to those currently working in the legal services sector, that there is extensive statutory regulation. Solicitors, barristers and chartered legal executives are only too well aware of this since they are ‘legally’ bound to put their hands in their pockets in order to pay for it. The privilege of having to pay for membership to a professional body, together with paying for your regulatory body and, in addition, the overarching supervisory body is a costly burden to bear. Unfortunately, the only individuals that really suffer as a consequence of this is the consumer of legal services, since the cost of statutory regulation is reflected in the fees charged to clients of such professionals.

The whole sector seems to have spiralled out of control in this respect. We should surely remember that ultimately,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Heather Gibson

Freeths—Heather Gibson

Freeths strengthens national tax team with Heather Gibson appointment

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise expands London secondaries team with addition of Mary Lavelle

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law welcomes ex-Irwin Mitchell team to launch Hestia Private Client

NEWS
Lawyers have welcomed plans to create specialist rape and serious sex offences courtrooms at every Crown Court
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
back-to-top-scroll