header-logo header-logo

Paralegal regulation—confidence & competence

02 July 2019 / Amanda Hamilton , Jane Robson
Issue: 7847 / Categories: Features , Profession , Legal services , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

Amanda Hamilton & Jane Robson explain why self-regulation for paralegals promotes access to justice & benefits the sector as a whole

  • Why paralegals are not regulated by statute and the benefits of self-regulation.

It comes as no surprise to those currently working in the legal services sector, that there is extensive statutory regulation. Solicitors, barristers and chartered legal executives are only too well aware of this since they are ‘legally’ bound to put their hands in their pockets in order to pay for it. The privilege of having to pay for membership to a professional body, together with paying for your regulatory body and, in addition, the overarching supervisory body is a costly burden to bear. Unfortunately, the only individuals that really suffer as a consequence of this is the consumer of legal services, since the cost of statutory regulation is reflected in the fees charged to clients of such professionals.

The whole sector seems to have spiralled out of control in this respect. We should surely remember that ultimately,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll