header-logo header-logo

Parental leave battles ahead?

05 March 2015
Issue: 7643 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The introduction of shared parental leave (SPL) next month could lead to “a battle of the sexes in the courts”, a leading employment lawyer has warned.

Under SPL, which comes into force on 5 April, a mother can share her 50 weeks of maternity leave with the father after the child is born.

Writing in NLJ this week, Julian Yew, employment partner at Penningtons Manches, says businesses considering operating an enhanced shared parental pay scheme will have to evaluate whether offering enhanced pay to mothers but not fathers would amount to sex discrimination.

If maternity leave can be transferred from a mother to a father, it can no longer be viewed as “purely for the protection of the mother’s health or special relationship with the new born”, Yew says. Men can therefore claim the same financial treatment.

He writes: “The irony in Parliament’s aims to advance equality by introducing SPL is that this will involve a battle of the sexes in the courts.”

Issue: 7643 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll