header-logo header-logo

Parliamentary privilege abused

12 September 2025 / Professor Graham Zellick CBE KC
Issue: 8130 / Categories: Opinion , Legal services , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail
229571
Professor Graham Zellick KC questions why parliamentarians are able to misuse their immunity with impunity

I have little in common with the shopkeeper and businessman Sir Philip Green, but one thing we do share is that we have both been the victim of an abuse of parliamentary privilege.

The circumstances were very different, however. One case concerned the disclosure of a truth suppressed by court order; the other the promulgation of a deliberate lie. In Green’s case, his name was revealed in the House of Lords contrary to the terms of an interim injunction and anonymity order issued by the Court of Appeal, designed to protect his reputation pending trial of a civil action. In my case, a member of Parliament (whom I prefer not to name, allowing him to rest in well-earned obscurity) simply told a lie about me that amounted to a serious attack on my professional integrity. Neither the peer nor the late MP suffered any sanctions or consequences.

Green took his case to the European

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Oliver Banks

Slater Heelis—Oliver Banks

Manchester firm strengthens Court of Protection expertise with partner hire

Talbots Law—Sara Pickerin & Nicholas Playford

Talbots Law—Sara Pickerin & Nicholas Playford

Agricultural law team expands with senior director appointments

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

NEWS
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold dives into the quirks of civil practice, from the Court of Appeal’s fierce defence of form N510 to fresh reminders about compliance and interest claims, in this week's Civil Way
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) has restated a fundamental truth, writes John Gould, chair of Russell-Cooke, in this week's NLJ: only authorised persons can conduct litigation. The decision sparked alarm, but Gould stresses it merely confirms the Legal Services Act 2007
The government’s decision to make the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) the Single Professional Services Supervisor marks a watershed in the UK’s fight against money laundering, says Rebecca Hughes of Corker Binning in this week's NLJ. The FCA will now oversee 60,000 firms across legal and accountancy sectors—a massive expansion of remit that raises questions over resources and readiness 
The High Court's decision in Parfitt v Jones [2025] EWHC 1552 (Ch) provided a striking reminder of the need to instruct the right expert in retrospective capacity assessments, says Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell in NLJ this week
Paige Coulter of Quinn Emanuel reports on the UK’s first statutory definition of SLAPPs under the Economic Crime and Corporate Transparency Act 2023in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll