header-logo header-logo

12 September 2025 / Dr Graham Zellick CBE KC FAcSS
Issue: 8130 / Categories: Opinion , Legal services , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Parliamentary privilege abused

229571
Professor Graham Zellick KC questions why parliamentarians are able to misuse their immunity with impunity

I have little in common with the shopkeeper and businessman Sir Philip Green, but one thing we do share is that we have both been the victim of an abuse of parliamentary privilege.

The circumstances were very different, however. One case concerned the disclosure of a truth suppressed by court order; the other the promulgation of a deliberate lie. In Green’s case, his name was revealed in the House of Lords contrary to the terms of an interim injunction and anonymity order issued by the Court of Appeal, designed to protect his reputation pending trial of a civil action. In my case, a member of Parliament (whom I prefer not to name, allowing him to rest in well-earned obscurity) simply told a lie about me that amounted to a serious attack on my professional integrity. Neither the peer nor the late MP suffered any sanctions or consequences.

Green took his case to the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

International arbitration team strengthened by double partner hire

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Firm celebrates trio holding senior regional law society and junior lawyers division roles

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Partner joins commercial and business litigation team in London

NEWS
The Legal Action Group (LAG)—the UK charity dedicated to advancing access to justice—has unveiled its calendar of training courses, seminars and conferences designed to support lawyers, advisers and other legal professionals in tackling key areas of public interest law
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
back-to-top-scroll