header-logo header-logo

11 August 2011
Issue: 7478 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Partnership

Boghani v Nathoo [2011] EWHC 2101 (Ch), [2011] All ER (D) 39 (Aug)

The terms of s 38 of the Partnership Act 1890 demonstrated the following propositions: (i) the obligations of partners to third parties continued notwithstanding the dissolution of the partnership; (ii) in England, if not in Scotland, the satisfaction of those obligations by performance, release or novation or the payment of damages would not usually involve reliance on the terms of s 38; (iii) s 38 did not entitle the surviving partners to engage in new bargains or contracts so as to bind a deceased former partner; (iv) even in relation to transactions, not being new bargains or contracts, begun but unfinished at the time of dissolution s 38 applied only if and to the extent that the completion of such transactions was necessary to wind up the affairs of the partnership; and (v) s 38, if applicable, conferred a power; it did not impose any additional duty.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll