header-logo header-logo

Partnership

11 August 2011
Issue: 7478 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Boghani v Nathoo [2011] EWHC 2101 (Ch), [2011] All ER (D) 39 (Aug)

The terms of s 38 of the Partnership Act 1890 demonstrated the following propositions: (i) the obligations of partners to third parties continued notwithstanding the dissolution of the partnership; (ii) in England, if not in Scotland, the satisfaction of those obligations by performance, release or novation or the payment of damages would not usually involve reliance on the terms of s 38; (iii) s 38 did not entitle the surviving partners to engage in new bargains or contracts so as to bind a deceased former partner; (iv) even in relation to transactions, not being new bargains or contracts, begun but unfinished at the time of dissolution s 38 applied only if and to the extent that the completion of such transactions was necessary to wind up the affairs of the partnership; and (v) s 38, if applicable, conferred a power; it did not impose any additional duty.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll