header-logo header-logo

Party politics

08 March 2013 / Bob Watt
Issue: 7551 / Categories: Opinion , Public , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Does the SNP’s suggestion of an independence treat flout the law, asks Bob Watt

Independence Day; the hauling down of the Union Flag and the raising of the Saltire, and, of course, a party; perhaps the biggest for 309 years. If, as the SNP government intends, Scotland becomes A Nation Once Again in March 2016 one might very well expect a party.

Party promise

Would and, more importantly, should it be lawful for the Scottish Nationalists to promise any public celebration which would be contingent upon the electorate, which may be expanded to include 16 and 17 year olds, delivering a “Yes” vote in 2014? Many people would instinctively feel that if a valuable, non-political reward was predicated upon a certain result being obtained that the ballot was less than free and fair. People, not exclusively the young and inexperienced, may be swayed by the promise of a celebration, and any such promise would be held over the referendum result by the Unionist press threatening to deprive it of its validity.

Is

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll