header-logo header-logo

Party politics

08 March 2013 / Bob Watt
Issue: 7551 / Categories: Opinion , Public , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Does the SNP’s suggestion of an independence treat flout the law, asks Bob Watt

Independence Day; the hauling down of the Union Flag and the raising of the Saltire, and, of course, a party; perhaps the biggest for 309 years. If, as the SNP government intends, Scotland becomes A Nation Once Again in March 2016 one might very well expect a party.

Party promise

Would and, more importantly, should it be lawful for the Scottish Nationalists to promise any public celebration which would be contingent upon the electorate, which may be expanded to include 16 and 17 year olds, delivering a “Yes” vote in 2014? Many people would instinctively feel that if a valuable, non-political reward was predicated upon a certain result being obtained that the ballot was less than free and fair. People, not exclusively the young and inexperienced, may be swayed by the promise of a celebration, and any such promise would be held over the referendum result by the Unionist press threatening to deprive it of its validity.

Is

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll