header-logo header-logo

Pat Finucane: justice denied?

21 January 2021 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7917 / Categories: Features , Criminal
printer mail-detail
36443
Jon Robins questions the government’s decision to rule out a public inquiry into the circumstances surrounding the death of Pat Finucane

If ever there was an ‘activist lawyer’ (to use a 2020 neologism) it was Pat Finucane. At the end of last year Northern Ireland Secretary Brandon Lewis ruled out a public inquiry into state collusion in the murder of the human rights solicitor in 1989.

Born into a republican family from the Falls Road in Belfast, Pat Finucane was fully committed to the idea that everyone in his divided community deserved proper independent legal representation. The solicitor was as comfortable representing loyalist rioters hit by stray plastic bullets as their republican adversaries. As his widow, Geraldine, once put it: ‘Pat would have represented the people who shot him.’

Pat Finucane was shot 14 times in front of his wife and three children by loyalist gunmen who forced their way into his home. ‘One of the first times I saw my Dad on telly, he was being interviewed on the Six

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll