header-logo header-logo

Patent

06 February 2015
Issue: 7639 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Global Food Defence Systems Ltd and another v Van Den Noort Innovations Bv and others [2015] EWHC 153 (IPEC), [2015] All ER (D) 237 (Jan)

The claimants and defendants co-operated by means of an exclusive patent licence agreement to sell flood defence products. They fell out, and the defendants made statements on their website and in a letter threatening proceedings. The defendants had applied for a UK patent, which had not been granted. The claimants sought summary judgment on its claim that the defendant had made groundless threats of infringement proceedings, contending that the threats were groundless. The Intellectual Property Enterprise Court, in dismissing the application, held that the defendants had a real prospect of establishing at trial that the sale of the claimants’ products between the date of the threats and the grant of the patent had infringed the first defendant’s rights.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Mourant—Stephen Alexander

Mourant—Stephen Alexander

Jersey litigation lead appointed to global STEP Council

mfg Solicitors—nine trainees

mfg Solicitors—nine trainees

Firm invests in future talent with new training cohort

NEWS
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve reports on Haynes v Thomson, the first judicial application of the Supreme Court’s For Women Scotland ruling in a discrimination claim, in this week's NLJ
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
back-to-top-scroll