header-logo header-logo

Paternity—Same-sex couple—Right to parental status

06 June 2013
Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

AB v CD and another [2013] EWHC 1418 (Fam)

Family Division, Cobb J, 24 May 2013

The Family Court has given guidance on the determination of whether someone is a “parent”

Martin Kingerley for AB. Marisa Allman for CD. Ashley Thain for the Intervenor

The applicant, AB, was a lesbian woman aged 37. She began a relationship with CD in 1997. They attended the intervenor, a fertilisation clinic, in 2008. AB considered that such a clinic would enhance her prospect of acquiring “equal rights” to the children. They attended counselling and then a meeting with a consultant gynaecologist. AB signed a form which provided that she acknowledged that she and CD were being treated together and that she intended to have parental rights for any resulting child. Thereafter they had three rounds of treatment. In April 2009, Part II of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 (which amended the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990) came into force, which enabled the partner of a woman who had a child by IVF

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll