header-logo header-logo

06 June 2013
Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Paternity—Same-sex couple—Right to parental status

AB v CD and another [2013] EWHC 1418 (Fam)

Family Division, Cobb J, 24 May 2013

The Family Court has given guidance on the determination of whether someone is a “parent”

Martin Kingerley for AB. Marisa Allman for CD. Ashley Thain for the Intervenor

The applicant, AB, was a lesbian woman aged 37. She began a relationship with CD in 1997. They attended the intervenor, a fertilisation clinic, in 2008. AB considered that such a clinic would enhance her prospect of acquiring “equal rights” to the children. They attended counselling and then a meeting with a consultant gynaecologist. AB signed a form which provided that she acknowledged that she and CD were being treated together and that she intended to have parental rights for any resulting child. Thereafter they had three rounds of treatment. In April 2009, Part II of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 (which amended the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990) came into force, which enabled the partner of a woman who had a child by IVF

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Heather Gibson

Freeths—Heather Gibson

Freeths strengthens national tax team with Heather Gibson appointment

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise & Plimpton—Mary Lavelle

Debevoise expands London secondaries team with addition of Mary Lavelle

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law—Hestia Private Client

Excello Law welcomes ex-Irwin Mitchell team to launch Hestia Private Client

NEWS
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
A client cannot use a costs assessment to investigate whether their solicitor received commission on an after-the-event (ATE) insurance premium, the Court of Appeal has held
Law firms cannot be compelled to disclose documents protected by unwaived legal professional privilege (LPP) during misconduct investigations, the High Court has clarified
Solicitors have urged regulators not to impose unnecessary cost and complexity on third-party litigation funding
International demand for UK legal services is surging, with exports at record levels, according to Law Society research
back-to-top-scroll