header-logo header-logo

06 June 2013
Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Paternity—Same-sex couple—Right to parental status

AB v CD and another [2013] EWHC 1418 (Fam)

Family Division, Cobb J, 24 May 2013

The Family Court has given guidance on the determination of whether someone is a “parent”

Martin Kingerley for AB. Marisa Allman for CD. Ashley Thain for the Intervenor

The applicant, AB, was a lesbian woman aged 37. She began a relationship with CD in 1997. They attended the intervenor, a fertilisation clinic, in 2008. AB considered that such a clinic would enhance her prospect of acquiring “equal rights” to the children. They attended counselling and then a meeting with a consultant gynaecologist. AB signed a form which provided that she acknowledged that she and CD were being treated together and that she intended to have parental rights for any resulting child. Thereafter they had three rounds of treatment. In April 2009, Part II of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 2008 (which amended the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Act 1990) came into force, which enabled the partner of a woman who had a child by IVF

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Orwins—Maryam Abbasi

Orwins—Maryam Abbasi

Senior associate joins family law team in London

Tees Law—Stephen Williams

Tees Law—Stephen Williams

Firm appoints chief financial officer as it expands Essex office footprint

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Winckworth Sherwood—David Fendt

Restructuring and insolvency practice strengthened by partner hire

NEWS
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
A landmark ruling has delivered the first judicial application of the UK’s anti-SLAPP regime and provided fresh guidance on abusive litigation
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
back-to-top-scroll