header-logo header-logo

A pattern or a trend?

31 August 2016 / Lauren Grest
Issue: 7712 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Lauren Grest analyses demand for document review in Europe

  • In recent years there has been increased demand for document review services coming from law firms within Europe.
  • This article examines the reasons behind this demand for managed document review services and ponders whether it is a short term increase or a long-term trend.

Document review as an unbundled legal service has traditionally been used most heavily by litigation teams, particularly in the US and the UK where e-discovery is a requirement. Perhaps unsurprisingly continental Europe has been slower to adopt e-discovery technology. If an EU lawyer has heard of e-discovery technology and managed document review services, it is likely they would feel these services were more relevant to colleagues across the Channel and the Atlantic.

However, in recent years there has been increased demand for document review services coming from law firms within Europe. E-discovery providers such as Kroll Ontrack have recently unveiled review centres in Germany and Poland, as well as offering managed review services from their offices in France, the Netherlands,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll