header-logo header-logo

31 August 2016 / Lauren Grest
Issue: 7712 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

A pattern or a trend?

Lauren Grest analyses demand for document review in Europe

  • In recent years there has been increased demand for document review services coming from law firms within Europe.
  • This article examines the reasons behind this demand for managed document review services and ponders whether it is a short term increase or a long-term trend.

Document review as an unbundled legal service has traditionally been used most heavily by litigation teams, particularly in the US and the UK where e-discovery is a requirement. Perhaps unsurprisingly continental Europe has been slower to adopt e-discovery technology. If an EU lawyer has heard of e-discovery technology and managed document review services, it is likely they would feel these services were more relevant to colleagues across the Channel and the Atlantic.

However, in recent years there has been increased demand for document review services coming from law firms within Europe. E-discovery providers such as Kroll Ontrack have recently unveiled review centres in Germany and Poland, as well as offering managed review services from their offices in France, the Netherlands,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll