header-logo header-logo

Pay freezes, ‘costs plus’ & indirect discrimination

08 January 2021 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7915 / Categories: Features , Employment , Discrimination
printer mail-detail
35134
Charles Pigott takes the measure of the ‘costs plus’ rule of thumb in age discrimination cases
  • The Court of Appeal has confirmed that the discriminatory impact of slowing pay progression in the probation service could be justified in the context of the last public sector pay freeze.
  • The ruling examines the usefulness of the ‘costs plus’ test as a way of distinguishing between lawful and unlawful policies when these disadvantage protected groups.

The origins of the dispute in Heskett v Secretary of State for Justice [2020] EWCA Civ 1487, [2020] All ER (D) 72 (Dec) go back to the public sector pay freeze imposed by the coalition government after it took power in 2010. The Court of Appeal’s decision was announced two weeks before the 2020 spending review, in which the chancellor announced another pay freeze for the whole public sector, excluding the NHS.

The Court of Appeal, reaching the same conclusion as the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT) ((2019) UKEAT/0149/18, [2019] All ER (D) 12 (Jul)), dismissed

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll